After a general introduction to key concepts of security policy, the instructor will offer an up-to-date overview of the security situation in a changing global and European system, including new challenges like cyber threats, energy security, climate change, and piracy. Similarities and differences in the
security strategies of the United States and Europe will also be discussed in this context.
In the second part, the course will deal with the transformation of the UN as the global security organization and of the main transatlantic and European security institutions (NATO, the Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe and the EU). On the one hand, in order to remain relevant these organizations had to adapt their functions to new threats; on the other, the security vacuum in Eastern Europe after the Cold War had to be filled by the gradual admission of former communist countries to NATO and the EU. Case studies will focus on the more or less successful management of the recent Balkan crises by these organizations.
Students will be able to visit the headquarters of major international organizations in Vienna (e.g. the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN with its Office on Drugs and Crime).
Learning outcomes:
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
• Explain the complexity of contemporary security policy with its manifold non-military and non-State aspects
• Describe how major international security organizations function
• Compare and contrast U.S. and European political and strategic positions and priorities and of transatlantic relations in general
Method of presentation:
A political science approach will be adopted; in addition, key documents, above all international treaties, will also be analyzed from a legal point of view. The instructor will combine lecture-type presentations, using power points, with discussions which will also focus on current events.
Required work and form of assessment:
• Mid-term evaluation: choice between an oral exam in line with European academic culture and a written exam consisting of questions testing students´ understanding of basic issues: 20%
• Term paper (10-15 pages) on a topic from a list proposed by the instructor or proposed by students subject to approval by the instructor: 35%
• Final exam: choice between an oral and a written exam which will consist of several questions covering the entire course and a short essay: 35%
• Class participation in discussions, with questions put by the instructor or by students, on the basis of required readings as well as relevant current events in the area of international security: 10%
content:
I. Basic Concepts of International Security and Institutionalized Security Policy Options
Sessions 1-3
1. The need for a comprehensive definition of security in the 21st century. Hyde-Price, “Beware the Jabberwock!: Security Studies in the Twenty-First Century
2. Individual and collective security strategies and their advantages and disadvantages: great-power unilateralism (United States) and neutrality (Austria) vs. collective defense, collective security, cooperative security and non-reciprocal guarantees
3. American and European security strategies: comparing the “Obama Doctrine” with the “Solana Doctrine” of the EU
The European Security Strategy 2003
The National Security Strategy 2010
Neuhold, Transatlantic Differences: The Security Dimension
Obama, Renewing American Leadership
II. Security in Europe after the Cold War: Good and Bad News
Session 4
1. The structure of the present international system in the wake of the global economic crisis:unipolar, uni-multipolar, multipolar or non-polar?H
Huntington, The Lonely Superpower Wohlforth, The Stability of a Unipolar World Zakaria, The Future of American Power Haass, The Age of Nonpolarity
Joffe, The Default Power
Nye, The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective
Sessions 5-6
2. The good news – BUT
2.1. The peaceful sea change of 1989/90 in Europe: no losers and revisionists – the Balkan conflicts as the tragic exceptions
2.2. New opportunities for global and regional security cooperation – and their limits
2.3. The triumph of Western values: testing the theory of democratic peace – challenges by different value systems based on religion and social philosophy
2.4. Arms control and steps toward disarmament: INF, START/SORT/SOAT and CFE – continued weapon proliferation
Sessions 7-10
3. The bad news: changes in the weight of threats and dangers
3.1. The proliferation of WMD and “cyber-war”
Betts, The New Threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction
Acton, Rogers and Zimmerman, Beyond the Dirty Bomb: Rethinking Radiological Terror
Clark/Levin, Securing the Information Highway: How to Enhance the United States´ Electronic
Defenses
Lynn III, Defending a New Domain: The Pentagon´s Cyberstrategy
Klimburg, Mobilising Cyber Power
3.2. “Total” terrorism – a qualitatively new threat
Neuhold, Post-Cold War Terrorism: Systemic Background, Phenomenology and Definitions
Neuhold: International Terrorism: Definitions, Challenges and Responses
3.3. “Failed” and “rogue states”
3.4. Organized crime: drugs, human and arms trafficking and other crimes
3.5. Energy security – a serious threat to Europe
Yergin, Ensuring Energy Security
Elhefnawy, The Impending Oil Shock
3.6. Transboundary environmental hazards: climate change as security problem
Dupont, The Strategic Implications of Climate Change
Herman and Treverton, The Political Consequences of Climate Change
3.7. Mass migration and refugee movements as a security problem
3.8. Epidemics and pandemics: HIV/AIDS as a security risk
3.9. Food security
Dupont and Thirlwell, A New Era of Food Insecurity?
3.10. Piracy – the return of a threat regarded as eradicated
Boot, Pirates, Then and Now
4. The return of history and armed conflict to Europe: the Balkan tragedies
III. Global, Transatlantic and European Security Institutions
Sessions 11-13
1. The UN: increased effectiveness of collective security after the Cold War?
Neuhold, The United Nations as a Security Organization: The “Balkan Laboratory”
1.1. The prerequisites of collective security
1.2. The UN´s poor record during the Cold War because of the stalemate in the Security Council
1.2.1. A useful innovation not mentioned in the UN Charter: peacekeeping operations (PKOs)
1.3. The UN´s better but still not satisfactory performance after the Cold War
1.3.1. Authorization to use force but still no military action by the Security Council: Operations Desert Storm, Deny Flight, Sharp Guard
1.3.2. More frequent non-military sanctions: the shift to “targeted sanctions” and their limited Effectiveness
1.3.3. Authorizations to use force and “targeted sanctions”: Libya 2011
1.3.4. “2nd generation” PKOs: demanding mandates without the necessary means: the fiasco of UNPROFOR in the former Yugoslavia
1.3.5. Lessons learned: “robust enforcement by consent” – IFOR/SFOR in Bosnia and
Herzegovina and KFOR in Kosovo
1.3.6. Preventive PKOs: UNPROFOR and UNPREDEP in Macedonia
1.3.7. International administration of failed states and territories: part of the problem and not the solution? Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo
Gabassi, State Building in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo: International
Protectorates on their Way to Becoming Failed States?
1.3.8. Individual international criminality: the ICTY as trailblazer
1.3.9. Resort to armed force without a (sufficient) Security Council mandate: Operation
Allied Force 1999 and the “responsibility to protect”, Operation Iraqi Freedom 2003
Sessions 14-16
2. NATO beyond territorial defense of members states: out of area – or out of action
2.1. NATO: history, constituent treaty, structure and record during the Cold War
Howard, An Unhappy Successful Marriage
Mastny, Did NATO Win the Cold War?
2.2. The “new NATO” after the Cold War
Walt, Why Alliances Endure or Collapse
2.1.1. NATO and cooperative security: Partnership for Peace
2.1.2. “Robust enforcement by consent”: IFOR/SFOR, KFOR
2.1.3. NATO and UN enforcement action
2.1.4. NATO enforcement action without Security Council authorization: Operation Allied Force
2.2. The division of labor with the WEU/EU: ESDI within NATO and CJTFs
2.3 Filling the security vacuum in Eastern Europe
2.3.1. The North Atlantic Cooperation Council
2.3.2. Partnership for Peace
2.3.3. The admission of new members: the pros and cons of Eastern enlargement
2.4. NATO´s declining relevance in the wake of 9/11: The US: Article 5 – no, thank you Forster/Wallace, What is NATO for?
2.5. The division of NATO in the Iraq crisis of 2003
2.6. A new NATO after further enlargement and the establishment of the NATO Response Force?
Tertrais, The Changing Nature of Military Alliances
Daalder and Goldgeier, Global NATO
de Nevers, NATO´s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era
Berdal and Ucko, NATO at 60
2.7. The Lisbon Strategic Concept
NATO 2020: Assured Security; Dynamic Engagement
2.8. NATO in the Libyan Civil War
2.9. Afghanistan: NATO´s litmus test?
3. The EU: economic giant, political dwarf, military worm?
Neuhold, The European Union as an International Actor: Responses to Post-Cold War
Challenges
Sessions 17-19
3.1. European integration as a political project
Bindi, European Foreign Policy: A Historical Overview
3.2. From the EPC to the CFSP: treaty provisions and the actual record
3.3. The (C)ESDP: from Saint-Malo (1998) to the first operations in 2003
Haine, An historical perspective
Lindstrom, On the Ground: ESDP Operations
Salmon, The European Security and Defence Policy: Built on Rocks or Sand?
3.4. The “Solana Doctrine” as the conceptual foundation
A secure Europe in a better world: European Security Strategy
Toje, The 2003 European Union Security Strategy: A Critical Appraisal
3.5. Progress without a treaty basis: the Battle Groups, EDA, solidarity clause
3.6. The provisions of the Lisbon Treaty on the CFSP and CSDP
Keukeleire, European Security and Defense Policy: From Taboo to Spearhead of EU Foreign Policy
Sessions 20-21
4. The OSCE: from a forum for limited but comprehensive cooperation and peaceful confrontation to a pan-European cooperative security institution
4.1. The CSCE process from Helsinki to Paris 1973-1990
4.2. The institutionalization of the CSCE/OSCE
4.3. OSCE mechanisms
4.4 OSCE missions
4.5. The OSCE in crisis?
Dunay, The OSCE in crisis
Required readings:
Acton, James/ Rogers, Brooke M./Peter D. Zimmermann, Beyond the Dirty Bomb: Rethinking Radiological Terror, Survival 49, No. 3 (September 2007), pp. 151-168.
Berdal, Mats, and Ucko, David, NATO at 60, Survival 51, No. 2 (April/May 2009), pp. 55-76.
Betts, Richard K., The New Threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Foreign Affairs 77, No. 1 (January/February 1998), pp. 26-41.
Bindi, Federiga, European Foreign Policy: An Historical Overview, in: Federiga, Bindi (ed.), The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe´s Role in the World (Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C., 2010), pp.
Boot, Max, Pirates, Then and Now, Foreign Affairs 88, No. 4 (July/August 2009), pp. 95-109.
Borgerson, Scott G., Artic Meltdown: The Economic and Security Implications of Global Warming, Foreign Affairs 87, No. 2 (March/April 2008), pp. 63-77.
Calleo, David P., Unipolar Illusions, Survival 49, No. 3 (Autumn 2007), pp. 73-78.
Clark, Wesley K. and Levin, Peter L., Securing the Information Highway: How to Enhance the United States´ Electronic Defense, Foreign Affairs 88, No. 6 (November/December 2009), pp. 2-10.
Daalder, Ivo, and Goldgeier, James, Global NATO, Foreign Affairs 85, No. 5 (September/October 2006), pp. 105-113.
de Nevers, Renée, NATO´s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era, International Security 31, No. 4 (Spring 2007), pp. 34-66.
Dunay, Pál, The OSCE in Crisis, Chaillot Paper No. 88 (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris 2006).
Dupont, Alan, The Strategic Implications of Climate Change, Survival 50, No. 3 (June/July 2008), pp. 29-54.
Dupont, Alan/Thirlwell, Mark, A New Era of Food Insecurity, Survival 51, No. 3 (June/July 2009), pp. 71-98.
Elhefnawy, Nader, The Impending Oil Shock,Survival 50, No. 2 (April/May 2008), pp. 37-66.
Forster, Antony, and Wallace, William, What is NATO for?, Survival 43, No. 4 (2001), pp. 107-122.
Gabassi, Giovanni, State-building in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo: International Protectorates on their Way to Becoming Failed States?, Yearbook of the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna 42 (Diplomatic Academy Vienna, Vienna, 2007), pp. 91-142.
Haas, Richard N., The Age of Nonpolarity, Foreign Affairs 87, No. 3 (May/June 2008), pp. 44-56.
Haine, Jean-Yves, An historical perspective, in: Nicole, Gnesotto (ed.), EU Security and Defence Policy: The first five Years (1999-2004) (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2004), pp. 35-53.
Herman, Paul, and Treverton, Gregory, The Political Consequences of Climate change, Survival 51, No. 2 (April/May 2009), pp. 137-148.
Huntington, Samuel P., The Lonely Superpower, Foreign Affairs 78, No. 2 (April/March 1999), pp. 35-49.
Hyde-Price, Adrian, “Beware the Jabberwock!”: Security Studies in the Twenty-First Century, in: Heinz , Gärtner, Adrian, Hyde-Price, Erich, Reiter (eds.), Europe´s New Security (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder/London, 2001), pp. 27-54.
Joffe, Josef, The Default Power: The False Prophecy of America´s Decline, Foreign Affairs 88, No. 5 (September /October 2009), pp. 21-35.
Keukeleire, Stephan, European Security and Defense Policy: From Taboo to Spearhead of EU Foreign Policy
Lindstrom, Gustav, On the Ground: ESDP Operations, in: Nicole, Genesotto, EU Security and Defence Policy: The first five years (1999-2004), (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris 2004), pp. 111-129.
Lynn, William L., III, Defending a New Domain: The Pentagon´s Cyberstrategy, Foreign Affairs 89, No. 5 (September/October 2010), pp. 97-108.
Mastny,Vojtech, Did NATO Win the Cold War? Looking over the Wall, Foreign Affairs 78, No. 3 (May/June 1999), pp. 176-189.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, Post-cold war terrorism: systemic background, phenomenology and definitions, in: Société française pour le droit international (ed.), Journée Franco-Allemande. Les Nouvelles menaces contre la paix et la sécurité internationales (Editions A. Pedone, Paris, 2004), pp. 13-34.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, International Terrorism: Definitions, Challenges and Responses, in: Dieter, Mahncke, and Jörg, Monar (eds.), International Terrorism: A European Response to a Global Threat? (Peter Lang, Brussels, 2006), pp. 23-46.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, Human Rights and the Use of Force, in: Stephan, Breitenmoser et alii (eds.), Menschenrechte, Demokratie und Rechtsstaat, Liber amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2007), pp. 479 - 498.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, The United Nations as a Security Organization: The „Balkan Laboratory“, in: Christoph Benicke, Walter Gropp, Thilo Marauhn (eds.), S/A/I/L – Studies in Applied International Law. (Franz-von-Liszt-Institut für Internationales Recht und Rechtsvergleichung, Gießen, 2007).
Neuhold, Hanspeter, The European Union as an International Actor: Responses to Post-Cold War Challenges, in: Markus Kornprobst (ed.), Quo Vadis Europa? Twenty Years After the Fall of the Wall (Diplomatic Academy Viennna, Favorita Papers 02/2010, Vienna 2010), pp. 29-51.
Nye, Joseph S., Jr., The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective, Foreign Affairs 89, No. 6 (November/December 2010), pp. 2-12.
Obama, Barack, Renewing American Leadership, Foreign Affairs 86, No. 4 (July/August 2007), pp. 2-16. Salmon, Trevor, The European Security and Defence Policy: Built on Rocks or Sand? European Foreign Affairs Review 10, No. 3 (2005), pp. 359-379.
Tertrais, Bruno, The Changing Nature of Military Alliances, The Washington Quarterly 27, 2 (Spring 2004), pp.135-150.
Toje, Asle, The 2003 European Union Security Strategy: A Critical Appraisal, European Foreign Affairs Review 10 (2005), pp. 117-133.
Walt, Stephen M., Why Alliances Endure or Collapse, Survival 39, No. 1 (Spring 1997), pp. 156-179.
Wohlforth, William C., The Stability of a Unipolar World, International Security 24, No. 1 (Summer 1999), 5-41.
Yergin, Daniel, Ensuring Energy Security, Foreign Affairs 85, No. 2 (March/April 2006), pp. 69-82.
Zakaria, Fareed, The Future of American Power, Foreign Affairs 87, No. 3 (May/June 2008), pp. 18-43
Recommended readings:
Bindi, Federiga (ed.), The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe´s Role in the World (Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C., 2010).
Burrows, Matthew, and Treverton, Gregory F., A Strategic View of Energy Futures, Survival 49, No. 3 (Autumn 2007), pp. 79-90.
Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History, The National Interest 16 (1993), pp. 3-18.
Grevi, Giovanni, Helly, Damien, and Keohane Daniel (eds.), European Security and Defence Policy: The first ten years (1999-2009) (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2009).
Howorth, Julian, Security and Defence Policy in the European Union (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, and New York, 2007).
Kagan, Robert, Power and Weakness, Policy Review 113 (June/July 2002), pp. 1-21.
Keukeleire, Stephan, and MacNaughtan, Jennifer, The Foreign Policy of the European Union (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, and New York, 2008).
Lutterbeck, Derek, Blurring the Dividing Line: The Convergence of Internal and External Security in
Western Europe, European Security 14, No. 2 (June 2005), pp. 231-253.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L., Democratization and War, Foreign Affairs 74, No. 3 (May/June 1995), pp. 79-97.
Maresca, John J., To Helsinki: The Conference of Security and Cooperation in Europe 1973-1975 (Duke University Press, Durham and London, 1985).
Mastny,Vojtech, Did NATO Win the Cold War? Looking over the Wall, Foreign Affairs 78, No. 3 (May/June 1999), pp. 176-189.
Munro, Emily (ed.), Challenges to Neutral & Non-aligned Countries in Europe and Beyond (Geneva
Centre for Security Policy, Geneva 2005).
Paris, Roland, Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?, International Security 26, No. 2 (Fall 2001), pp. 87-102.
Peral, Luis (ed.), Global Security in a Multipolar World (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2009). Vascocelos, Alvaro (ed.), What ambitions for European defence in 2020? (EU Institute for Security
Studies, Paris, 2009).
Waltz, Kenneth, Structural Realism after the Cold War, International Security 25, No. 1 (Summer 2000), pp. 5-41.
Brief Biography of Instructor:
Dr. Hanspeter Neuhold is Professor emeritus of International Law and International Relations at the University of Vienna. He studied law and political science in Vienna, Paris and New York City (Columbia University). Hanspeter Neuhold worked at the Austrian Ministry for Foreign Affairs from 1969 to 1970 and was director of the Austrian Institute of International Affairs from 1988 to 1996. He was a visiting professor at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa (1978), Stanford University (1988) and Leiden University (2001). He serves as Academic Director of the Master of Advanced International Studies Program organized by the University of Vienna and the Diplomatic Academy Vienna and is visiting professor at the College of Europe in Bruges. He has published about 200 books and articles on international political and legal issues. His most recent publication is Neuhold, The European Union as an International Actor: Responses to Post-Cold War Challenges.
After a general introduction to key concepts of security policy, the instructor will offer an up-to-date overview of the security situation in a changing global and European system, including new challenges like cyber threats, energy security, climate change, and piracy. Similarities and differences in the
security strategies of the United States and Europe will also be discussed in this context.
In the second part, the course will deal with the transformation of the UN as the global security organization and of the main transatlantic and European security institutions (NATO, the Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe and the EU). On the one hand, in order to remain relevant these organizations had to adapt their functions to new threats; on the other, the security vacuum in Eastern Europe after the Cold War had to be filled by the gradual admission of former communist countries to NATO and the EU. Case studies will focus on the more or less successful management of the recent Balkan crises by these organizations.
Students will be able to visit the headquarters of major international organizations in Vienna (e.g. the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN with its Office on Drugs and Crime).
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
• Explain the complexity of contemporary security policy with its manifold non-military and non-State aspects
• Describe how major international security organizations function
• Compare and contrast U.S. and European political and strategic positions and priorities and of transatlantic relations in general
A political science approach will be adopted; in addition, key documents, above all international treaties, will also be analyzed from a legal point of view. The instructor will combine lecture-type presentations, using power points, with discussions which will also focus on current events.
• Mid-term evaluation: choice between an oral exam in line with European academic culture and a written exam consisting of questions testing students´ understanding of basic issues: 20%
• Term paper (10-15 pages) on a topic from a list proposed by the instructor or proposed by students subject to approval by the instructor: 35%
• Final exam: choice between an oral and a written exam which will consist of several questions covering the entire course and a short essay: 35%
• Class participation in discussions, with questions put by the instructor or by students, on the basis of required readings as well as relevant current events in the area of international security: 10%
Acton, James/ Rogers, Brooke M./Peter D. Zimmermann, Beyond the Dirty Bomb: Rethinking Radiological Terror, Survival 49, No. 3 (September 2007), pp. 151-168.
Berdal, Mats, and Ucko, David, NATO at 60, Survival 51, No. 2 (April/May 2009), pp. 55-76.
Betts, Richard K., The New Threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Foreign Affairs 77, No. 1 (January/February 1998), pp. 26-41.
Bindi, Federiga, European Foreign Policy: An Historical Overview, in: Federiga, Bindi (ed.), The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe´s Role in the World (Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C., 2010), pp.
Boot, Max, Pirates, Then and Now, Foreign Affairs 88, No. 4 (July/August 2009), pp. 95-109.
Borgerson, Scott G., Artic Meltdown: The Economic and Security Implications of Global Warming, Foreign Affairs 87, No. 2 (March/April 2008), pp. 63-77.
Calleo, David P., Unipolar Illusions, Survival 49, No. 3 (Autumn 2007), pp. 73-78.
Clark, Wesley K. and Levin, Peter L., Securing the Information Highway: How to Enhance the United States´ Electronic Defense, Foreign Affairs 88, No. 6 (November/December 2009), pp. 2-10.
Daalder, Ivo, and Goldgeier, James, Global NATO, Foreign Affairs 85, No. 5 (September/October 2006), pp. 105-113.
de Nevers, Renée, NATO´s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era, International Security 31, No. 4 (Spring 2007), pp. 34-66.
Dunay, Pál, The OSCE in Crisis, Chaillot Paper No. 88 (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris 2006).
Dupont, Alan, The Strategic Implications of Climate Change, Survival 50, No. 3 (June/July 2008), pp. 29-54.
Dupont, Alan/Thirlwell, Mark, A New Era of Food Insecurity, Survival 51, No. 3 (June/July 2009), pp. 71-98.
Elhefnawy, Nader, The Impending Oil Shock,Survival 50, No. 2 (April/May 2008), pp. 37-66.
Forster, Antony, and Wallace, William, What is NATO for?, Survival 43, No. 4 (2001), pp. 107-122.
Gabassi, Giovanni, State-building in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo: International Protectorates on their Way to Becoming Failed States?, Yearbook of the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna 42 (Diplomatic Academy Vienna, Vienna, 2007), pp. 91-142.
Haas, Richard N., The Age of Nonpolarity, Foreign Affairs 87, No. 3 (May/June 2008), pp. 44-56.
Haine, Jean-Yves, An historical perspective, in: Nicole, Gnesotto (ed.), EU Security and Defence Policy: The first five Years (1999-2004) (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2004), pp. 35-53.
Herman, Paul, and Treverton, Gregory, The Political Consequences of Climate change, Survival 51, No. 2 (April/May 2009), pp. 137-148.
Howard, Michael, An Unhappy Successful Marriage, Foreign Affairs 78, No. 3 (May/June 1999), pp.164 -175.
Huntington, Samuel P., The Lonely Superpower, Foreign Affairs 78, No. 2 (April/March 1999), pp. 35-49.
Hyde-Price, Adrian, “Beware the Jabberwock!”: Security Studies in the Twenty-First Century, in: Heinz , Gärtner, Adrian, Hyde-Price, Erich, Reiter (eds.), Europe´s New Security (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder/London, 2001), pp. 27-54.
Joffe, Josef, The Default Power: The False Prophecy of America´s Decline, Foreign Affairs 88, No. 5 (September /October 2009), pp. 21-35.
Keukeleire, Stephan, European Security and Defense Policy: From Taboo to Spearhead of EU Foreign Policy
Klimburg, Alexander, Mobilising Cyber Power, Survival 53, No. 1 (February-March 2011), pp. 41-60.
Lindstrom, Gustav, On the Ground: ESDP Operations, in: Nicole, Genesotto, EU Security and Defence Policy: The first five years (1999-2004), (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris 2004), pp. 111-129.
Lynn, William L., III, Defending a New Domain: The Pentagon´s Cyberstrategy, Foreign Affairs 89, No. 5 (September/October 2010), pp. 97-108.
Mastny,Vojtech, Did NATO Win the Cold War? Looking over the Wall, Foreign Affairs 78, No. 3 (May/June 1999), pp. 176-189.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, Post-cold war terrorism: systemic background, phenomenology and definitions, in: Société française pour le droit international (ed.), Journée Franco-Allemande. Les Nouvelles menaces contre la paix et la sécurité internationales (Editions A. Pedone, Paris, 2004), pp. 13-34.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, Transatlantic Differences: The Security Dimension in: Waldemar, Zacharasiewicz (ed.), Transatlantische Differenzen/Transatlantic Differences (Böhlau, Vienna –Cologne– Weimar, 2004), pp. 95 – 110.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, International Terrorism: Definitions, Challenges and Responses, in: Dieter, Mahncke, and Jörg, Monar (eds.), International Terrorism: A European Response to a Global Threat? (Peter Lang, Brussels, 2006), pp. 23-46.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, Human Rights and the Use of Force, in: Stephan, Breitenmoser et alii (eds.), Menschenrechte, Demokratie und Rechtsstaat, Liber amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2007), pp. 479 - 498.
Neuhold, Hanspeter, The United Nations as a Security Organization: The „Balkan Laboratory“, in: Christoph Benicke, Walter Gropp, Thilo Marauhn (eds.), S/A/I/L – Studies in Applied International Law. (Franz-von-Liszt-Institut für Internationales Recht und Rechtsvergleichung, Gießen, 2007).
Neuhold, Hanspeter, The European Union as an International Actor: Responses to Post-Cold War Challenges, in: Markus Kornprobst (ed.), Quo Vadis Europa? Twenty Years After the Fall of the Wall (Diplomatic Academy Viennna, Favorita Papers 02/2010, Vienna 2010), pp. 29-51.
Nye, Joseph S., Jr., The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective, Foreign Affairs 89, No. 6 (November/December 2010), pp. 2-12.
Obama, Barack, Renewing American Leadership, Foreign Affairs 86, No. 4 (July/August 2007), pp. 2-16. Salmon, Trevor, The European Security and Defence Policy: Built on Rocks or Sand? European Foreign Affairs Review 10, No. 3 (2005), pp. 359-379.
Tertrais, Bruno, The Changing Nature of Military Alliances, The Washington Quarterly 27, 2 (Spring 2004), pp.135-150.
Toje, Asle, The 2003 European Union Security Strategy: A Critical Appraisal, European Foreign Affairs Review 10 (2005), pp. 117-133.
Walt, Stephen M., Why Alliances Endure or Collapse, Survival 39, No. 1 (Spring 1997), pp. 156-179.
Wohlforth, William C., The Stability of a Unipolar World, International Security 24, No. 1 (Summer 1999), 5-41.
Yergin, Daniel, Ensuring Energy Security, Foreign Affairs 85, No. 2 (March/April 2006), pp. 69-82.
Zakaria, Fareed, The Future of American Power, Foreign Affairs 87, No. 3 (May/June 2008), pp. 18-43
Bindi, Federiga (ed.), The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe´s Role in the World (Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C., 2010).
Burrows, Matthew, and Treverton, Gregory F., A Strategic View of Energy Futures, Survival 49, No. 3 (Autumn 2007), pp. 79-90.
Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History, The National Interest 16 (1993), pp. 3-18.
Grevi, Giovanni, Helly, Damien, and Keohane Daniel (eds.), European Security and Defence Policy: The first ten years (1999-2009) (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2009).
Howorth, Julian, Security and Defence Policy in the European Union (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, and New York, 2007).
Kagan, Robert, Power and Weakness, Policy Review 113 (June/July 2002), pp. 1-21.
Keukeleire, Stephan, and MacNaughtan, Jennifer, The Foreign Policy of the European Union (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, and New York, 2008).
Lutterbeck, Derek, Blurring the Dividing Line: The Convergence of Internal and External Security in
Western Europe, European Security 14, No. 2 (June 2005), pp. 231-253.
Mansfield Edward D., and Snyder Jack L., Democratization and War, Foreign Affairs 74, No. 3 (May/June 1995), pp. 79-97.
Maresca, John J., To Helsinki: The Conference of Security and Cooperation in Europe 1973-1975 (Duke University Press, Durham and London, 1985).
Mastny,Vojtech, Did NATO Win the Cold War? Looking over the Wall, Foreign Affairs 78, No. 3 (May/June 1999), pp. 176-189.
Munro, Emily (ed.), Challenges to Neutral & Non-aligned Countries in Europe and Beyond (Geneva
Centre for Security Policy, Geneva 2005).
Nye, Joseph S., Jr., Cyber Power (Belfer Center, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge MA, 2010), http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/cyber-power.pdf.
Paris, Roland, Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?, International Security 26, No. 2 (Fall 2001), pp. 87-102.
Peral, Luis (ed.), Global Security in a Multipolar World (EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2009). Vascocelos, Alvaro (ed.), What ambitions for European defence in 2020? (EU Institute for Security
Studies, Paris, 2009).
Waltz, Kenneth, Structural Realism after the Cold War, International Security 25, No. 1 (Summer 2000), pp. 5-41.
Dr. Hanspeter Neuhold is Professor emeritus of International Law and International Relations at the University of Vienna. He studied law and political science in Vienna, Paris and New York City (Columbia University). Hanspeter Neuhold worked at the Austrian Ministry for Foreign Affairs from 1969 to 1970 and was director of the Austrian Institute of International Affairs from 1988 to 1996. He was a visiting professor at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa (1978), Stanford University (1988) and Leiden University (2001). He serves as Academic Director of the Master of Advanced International Studies Program organized by the University of Vienna and the Diplomatic Academy Vienna and is visiting professor at the College of Europe in Bruges. He has published about 200 books and articles on international political and legal issues. His most recent publication is Neuhold, The European Union as an International Actor: Responses to Post-Cold War Challenges.