The Integrative Seminar is mandatory for all European Union Program students. It provides students with an understanding of the origin, development and workings of the European Union, and how these are related to political developments at both the national and international levels. It further constitutes the context in which preparatory sessions preceding each field trip are held and post field trip analysis is conducted. The most important function of the integrative seminar is to serve as a capstone for discussion and analysis of coursework and field study insights, as well as a launching pad for the Model EU simulation.
Prerequisites:
None
Attendance policy:
All IES courses require attendance and participation. Attendance is mandatory per IES policy. Any unexcused absence will incur a penalty of 3% on your final grade. Any student who has more than three (3) unexcused absences will receive an “F” as the final grade in the course. Absences due to sickness, religious observances, and family emergencies may be excusable at the discretion of the Center Director.
In the case of an excused absence, it is the student’s responsibility to inform the Academic Dean of the absence with an Official Excused Absence Form, as well as any other relevant documentation (e.g. a doctor’s note), and to keep a record thereof. This form must be turned in as soon as possible before the class, in the case of a planned absence, or immediately after the class, in the case of an unplanned absence, in order for the absence to be considered excused. It is also the student’s responsibility to inform the professor of the missed class. Students can collect and submit the Official Excused Absence Form from the office of the Academic Dean.
TESTS MISSED DURING UNEXCUSED ABSENCES CANNOT BE MADE UP!
The use of laptop computers during class is not permitted. Cell phones are to be switched off. Updated information on your course and readings can be found on the Moodle platform at https://eu.elearning.iesabroad.org/.
Learning outcomes:
Students will complete the course having developed a comprehensive understanding of the political and economic processes over the wide range of the 27 EU countries. They will be able to produce academic analyses of the achievements, the short-comings, and the potential of the European project. In addition, they will then have developed comparative political-cultural competencies, allowing them a fresh perspective on their domestic political system.
They will be able to exhibit an in-depth understanding of complexities of the decision-making and policy making processes in the EU, and evaluate the effects of these processes on individual countries. In addition, they will be able to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the interrelation between the EU institutions and the political structures of the EU member states, including such concepts as subsidiarity and Europeanization. Finally, students will learn to use their insights into the multiplicity of power relations between the various member states.
The above objectives will be achieved by classroom lectures and discussions and independent study supplemented by first-hand experience on the field trips (including meetings with EU officials, specialized academics, and lobbyists working on or with the EU), and by active participation in the simulation of a European summit which also presents students with the opportunity to develop negotiating skills and articulate a given position.
Method of presentation:
Students should expect a dynamic course with many interactive components, such as simulations, quizzes and debates. The professor will guide the students through the course material with the goal that students be able to analyze the subject matter from different perspectives and draw their own conclusions. Students should expect a high level of engagement which will be reflected in both group work and individual presentations. Participation is part of the students grade, therefore it is expected that all students do contribute during classes, in moodle projects and assignments, field trip lectures and during the Model EU. There will be written assignments for some of the readings as well as activities on moodle. The field-study trips to the EU and related European institutions, to Berlin and Prague, and an elective trip, as well as the Model EU are core components of the course. Insights gained on the trips will flow into class work and the preparation of the Model EU. At the Model EU, each student will be a member of a country delegation, the European Commission, or the Council Presidency and Secretariat.
Required work and form of assessment:
Mandatory attendance, classroom/field trip/moodle participation and reading and written assignments (25%), field trip reflection essays /video blog (20%), two exams (30%), Model EU preparation & participation (25%)
There will be two exams on contents covered in the seminars and/or the readings. There are three written assignments for the Model EU (the policy statement, a poster of the country/position you are presenting in the Model EU, and participation in delegation draft proposals). Moreover, students will have to keep a field trip journal for each trip and write an academic reflection or create a video blog that places the trips in the context of the course for the first two trips. These assignments are described in more detail later in this syllabus.
Seminar discussions are based upon the compulsory readings, written assignments and the teaching introductions given at each session.
content:
Intensive Introductory Week (Monday, September 10 to Friday, September 14, 2012)
I. History of the European Union
1. Welcome to the European Union! (Monday, September 10, 9.00 – 10.30 am)
Introduction and expectations - What is the European Union?
2. Europe and the European Union (Monday, September 10, 10.45 – 12.15 pm)
Why a European Union? – Who can join? – How is policy made? – The EU and its citizens
3. The History of the EU I (Tuesday, September 11, 9.00 – 10.30 am)
Post-WW II Europe, the Cold War and European integration – From the Schuman Plan to the European Economic Community [Bache/George/Bulmer, 80-132]
4. The History of the EU II (Tuesday, September 11, 10.45 – 12.15 pm)
From the ‘Dark Ages’ to the European Union [Bache/George/Bulmer, 133-180]
5. Movie Session “Das Leben der Anderen” (Tuesday, September 11, 3.45 – 6.00 pm)
The movie "Das Leben der Anderen" on life in the GDR and particularly the role of the Stasi (internal security police of the GDR) will be shown. The movie is discussed in class on Friday, September 14.
6. The History of the EU III (Wednesday, September 12, 09.00 – 10.30 am)
Ever closer and ever larger Union? The EU’s survival strategies from the Treaty of Nice to the financial crisis [Bache/George/Bulmer, 181-222]
7. The EU Parliament (Wednesday, September 12, 10.45 – 12.15 pm)
Composition and functions – The struggle for power – Debating the EP [Bache/George/Bulmer, 292 - 313]
Field Study Trip to the European Parliament (Strasbourg). The workings and functions of the EP. (Wednesday, September 12, in the afternoon)
8. Cold War Histories – The EU, Germany and Czechoslovakia (Thursday, September 13, 9.00 – 10.30 am)
The Cold War and Europe – Examples from Germany and Czechoslovakia
9. Unified Germany (Thursday, September 13, 10.45 – 12:15 pm)
Looking back: 20 years of unified Germany – Movie discussion [Anderson, The Federal Republic at Twenty]
10. First Exam (Friday, September 14, 9.30 – 10.30 am)
Exam on the first 9 sessions
11. Field Study Preparation and Briefing on the Model EU (Friday, September 14, 10:45 – 12:15 pm)
APPLICATIONS FOR MODEL EU POSITIONS DUE BY 11:59 PM SUNDAY, September 16 (via Model EU Moodle Course)
Field Study Trip I (Berlin and Prague). Europe: From Division towards integration (Monday, September 17 to Saturday, September 22, 2012)
12.Field Trip I Reflection (Tuesday, September 25, 4.30 - 6.00 pm)
Assignment of Model EU positions
II. The Institutionional Architecture of the Eu: the Decision making process and the Decision makers
13. The EU Institutions 1 (Friday, September 28, 10.45-12.15 am)
The Institutional Architecture [Bache/George/Bulmer, 223 - 254]
Field Trip Reflection Essay I or FIELD TRIP VIDEO BLOG DUE
14. The EU Institutions 2 (Tuesday, October 2, 4.30-6.00 pm)
The European Commission [Bache/George/Bulmer, 255 - 271]
15. The EU Institutions 3 (Friday, October 5, 10.45-12.15 am)
The European Council and the Council of Ministers [Bache/George/Bulmer, 272 - 291]
16. The EU Institutions 4 (Tuesday, October 9, 4.30 – 6.00 pm)
The European Court of Justice & Organized Interests [Bache/George/Bulmer, 314 - 346]
17. Field Trip Preparation (Friday, October 12, 12.00-13.00 pm)
AGENDA WITH DRAFT PROPOSALS DUE
(Permanent Presidency, High Representative and Secretariat only!)
Field Study Trip II: European Institutions in Western Europe
(Monday, October 15 to Sunday, October 21, 2012)
18. Field Trip II Debriefing (Tuesday, October 23, 4.30-6.00 pm)
III. Policy Making and Policy Fields of the EU: Selected Examples and contextualization with the Model EU
19. Policies and Policy Making in the European Union (Friday, October 26, 10.45-12.15 am)
The European Policy Agenda – The EU Policy Process – Minor Policy Areas – Major Policy Areas [Bache/George/Bulmer, 347 - 369]
Field Trip Reflection Essay II or FIELD TRIP VIDEO BLOG DUE
20.Policy Issue I: Enlargement (Tuesday, October 30, 4.30-6.00 pm)
Historical overview – Enlargement procedure - Risks and chances of enlargement [Bache/George/Bulmer, 527 – 550]
21. Policy Issue II: Common Agricultural Policy (Tuesday, November 6, 4.30-6.00 pm)
Historical background – Pros and Cons of agricultural protection – CAP reforms, its future and its cost [Bache/George/Bulmer, 370 - 383]
Historical background – Pros and Cons of cohesion policy – Reforms, its future and its cost [Bache/George/Bulmer, 422 - 447]
POLICY STATEMENT DUE
23. Policy Issue IV: Freedom, Security and Justice (Tuesday, November 13, 4.30-6.00pm)
From intergovernmental cooperation to a supranational common security area [Bache/George/Bulmer, 466 - 488]
24. The Model EU Agenda (Friday, November 16, 10.45 – 12.15pm)
The policy fields and the Model EU Agenda – Country positions – country presentations [Reading: tba]
25. Field Trip III Preparation (Tuesday, November 20, 4.30-6.00 pm)
WORKING GROUPS NEED TO MAKE THEIR DELEGATION AGENDA PROPOSALS (draft versions) VISIBLE ON MODEL EU MOODLE COURSE
Field Study Trip III: Respective Trip Option
(Thursday, November 22 to Friday, November 30, 2012)
26. Field Trip III Debriefing (Tuesday, December 4, 4:30 – 6:00 pm)
27.Mock Debate on current topic in preparation for Model EU (Tuesday, December 11, 4.30-6.00 pm) Preparing the Model EU
Positions, Rules of Procedure, Preliminary Agenda, Policy Drafts, Policy Statements, Independent Research, Deadlines … [Handout for Model EU (moodle)]
DELEGATION AGENDA PROPOSALS NEED TO BE FINALIZED (December 12)
IV. Capstone: Model European Union Summit
28. Model EU preparatory session (Thursday, December 13, 6.15 to 8 pm)
Tour de Table – Final Setting of the Agenda – Coalition Caucuses
POSTER PRESENTATIONS DUE!
29. Model EU (Friday, December 14, all day)
30. Model EU (Saturday, December 15, all day)
31. Reflection on the term and the Model EU: The EU as a multinational composite product which is more than the sum of its parts (time: tba) European Union – more than a least common denominator / European Union – more than just its member states combined
32. Final (Wednesday, December 19, 10.00 – 11.30 am)
Required readings:
Bache, Ian, Stephen George and Simon Bulmer (eds.). Politics in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011³.
Gänzle, Stefan. “EU Governance and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Framework for Analysis.” Europe-Asia Studies, December 2009, Vol. 61 Issue 10. 1715-1734
Gaveta, Eli, “Post accession conditionality.” KFG Working Paper no.18, October 2010
Lieb, Julia and Martin Kremer. “Empowering EU Diplomacy. The European External Action Service as an Opportunity for EU Foreign Policy.” SWP Comments. February 2010. http://www.swp- berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2010C02_lbj_kre_ks.pdf (January 7, 2011)
Pirjola, Jari. “European Asylum Policy: Inclusions and Exclusions under the Surface of Universal Human Rights Language.” European Journal of Migration and Law 11 (2009): 347-366
In addition, there will occasionally be other reading assignments and handouts from the instructor
Recommended readings:
Artis, Michael (ed.). The Economics of the European Union: Policy and Analysis. Oxford: University Press, 2007.
Aslund, Anders (ed.). Europe after Enlargement. Cambridge: University Press, 2007.
Bain, Jessica (ed.). European Union Identity: Perceptions from Asia and Europe. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007.
Baldwin, Richard and Charles Wyplosz. The Economics of the European Union. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill, 2004.
Bulmer, Simon and Christian Lequesne. The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005.
Casarini, Nicola (ed.). European Foreign Policy in an Evolving International System: The Road Towards Convergence. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.
Dinan, Desmond. Europe Recast. A History of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004.
Dinan, Desmond. Ever Closer Union. An Introduction to European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005³.
El-Agraa, Ali M. (ed.). The European Union: Economics and Policies. Harlow: Prentice Hall, 20078.
Fraser, Cameron. An Introduction to European Foreign Policy. London: Routledge, 2007.
Giddens, Anthony. Europe in the Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
Hill, Christopher and Michael Smith. International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005.
Hix, Simon. The Political System of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005².
Howorth, Jolyon. Security and Defence Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.
Judt, Tony. Postwar. A History of Europe Since 1945. New York: Penguin, 2005.
Kohler-Koch, Beate (ed.). Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union. Lanman: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007.
McCormick, John. The European Superpower. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.
Molle, Willem. European Cohesion Policy. London: Routledge, 2007.
Neal, Larry. The Economics of Europe and the European Union. Cambridge: University Press, 2007.
Nugent, Neil. The Government and Politics of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 20066.
Peterson, John and Michael Shackleton (eds.). The Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006².
Rifkin, Jeremy. The European Dream. How Europe’s Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream. New York: Jeremy Tarcher, 2004.
Telò, Mario. Europe: A Civilian Power? European Union, Global Governance, World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.
Wallace, Helen, William Wallace and Mark Pollack (eds.). Policy Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford UP, 20055.
Weidenfeld, Werner. Understanding the European Constitution. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation, 2007.
In order to keep up to date on current events, especially those involving European affairs, it is recommended that you regularly read the Economist, a British weekly. Its name is misleading, as the paper caters not only to economists and the business community, but also to a wider educated public. It also always contains a section on “Europe”. In addition, listen to the BBC worldwide services and/or watch BBC television.
Notes:
About the course structure: The course is divided into four main parts. The first is an intensive introductory phase during which you will be learning about the history of the EU and look at two member states, Germany and Czech Republic, in more detail. You will visit these two member states on the first field trip. There will be a test about the material covered at the end of this phase.
The second part begins with the twice weekly regular classes and is devoted to the institutional architecture of the EU as well as the four major EU decision-making institutions: the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice.
The third section of the course covers some of the major policy fields of the EU. First the background and historical development of these policies is discussed, before these are placed into context with current policies and politics in the EU. These policies are the four major topics of the third part of the class, a 2 1/2 day Model EU simulation of a European Council meeting to be held in the IES EU Center. The Model EU will be the capstone of the class.
Moreover, there are four classes integrated into the second part which are devoted to the preparation of and reflection on the field-study trips. These classes are designed to ensure that students derive as much information and inspiration from the field-study lectures as possible and that they are able to connect their insights with the academic work, both classes and Model EU, in Freiburg.
The Model EU
The Model EU is a simulation of a summit meeting of the European Council (Heads of Government/State and Foreign Ministers). Students will take on different roles at this simulation representing countries or institutions in the negotiations about a pre-set agenda. The basic agenda topics are: 1) Enlargement and the Neighborhood Policy, 2) Reforming CAP in light of the new financial framework, 3) Reforming Cohesion Policy in light of the new financial framework, and 4) The Area of Freedom Security and Justice. This agenda will be narrowed down and focused by the Permanent President, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs in cooperation with the Secretariat of the Council. In addition, the rotating presidency will cooperate in setting the agenda. Moreover, you will receive draft proposals by the Presidency and the Secretariat of the Council on the agenda items. Both, the agenda and the draft proposals, will be distributed about two weeks prior to the due date of the policy statements. All delegations may write or prepare proposals of their own or in cooperation with other delegations to be introduced at the summit meeting. The agenda is in part discussed in separate councils, one featuring Heads of Government/State (Reforming CAP and Cohesion Policy, Financial Framework) and another Foreign Ministers (Freedom Security and Justice, Enlargement and Neighborhood Policy).
The Model EU is prepared in class both in terms of procedure and in terms of content. However, it is imperative that all students prepare for the simulation independently. All participants need to be well versed in the Rules of Procedure as well as the topics being discussed in their forum. Moreover, all students need to have a clear concept of their role (e.g. the position of their government on the topics) to be able to play this role effectively, adjust to unforeseen developments and to generally stay in character. Faculty will be present at the summit meeting. However, they will interfere as little as possible with the proceedings. The effective running of the simulation is the responsibility of the Presidency / High Representative and all other participants.
At the end of the Model EU you will have to present your Presidency Conclusions. This is a document consisting of all decisions you were able to reach during the summit meeting. These will be based on the draft proposals prepared by the Presidency / Secretariat, but will necessarily reflect the national and ideological positions brought to the bargaining table. Moreover, some proposals may have been successfully introduced or broadened during the summit. Yet others may have failed to receive sufficient backing from all member states and there for will not make it into the Presidency Conclusions.
Students need to apply for a particular position, either a country delegate position or an institutional role (Permanent President, High Representative of CFSP, Council Secretariat and Commissioner). All students must hand in written applications stating their motivation, qualification and expectations for the hoped for position(s) and/or country (please provide alternative choices). You can also apply in a more general manner, e.g. “I would like to represent a smaller country as Foreign Minister because …”. For the chair positions (Permanent President and High Representative) experience in similar simulations or student government will be helpful. Applications should be 0.5 to 1 page long.
Policy Statement, Draft Proposals and Model EU Poster
If you are representing a country at the Model-EU you will have to prepare a policy statement which presents the basic stances of your country delegation on the issues on the agenda. The Permanent President, the High Representative of CFSP and the members of the Council Secretariat (organizing committee) will write draft proposals on the agenda topics instead. Moreover, you will have to provide a poster of the country/ position you are representing in the Model EU with the most important information concerning the Model EU-topics.
Policy Statements
Except for a 1 page cover letter policy statements are written separately by each member of the delegation (Heads of Government/State and Finance Ministers) on the topics on the respective agendas (each participant has to write 3-4 pages). However, the policy statements are handed in collectively as one document. Moreover, the delegation has to write an introductory note together. The statements should have one common format. Students are graded separately for their respective parts of the policy statement.
There are various ways to write your policy statement. The essential aspect is that you have to provide your delegation’s basic stance on the issues at hand. Depending on your strategy and your interest in a given topic you can be more or less open about your positions and intentions. You might for example want to hint at possible compromises to show your conciliatory attitude. In contrast, you might find it advantages on another issue to take a strong bargaining position.
Policy statements are written in “high style.” You are writing as the highest representatives of your country and these are official documents. This does not mean that you should write meaningless statements in inflated prose. The policy statements need to have substance as they are the basis for discussion at the summit meeting.
Draft Proposals
Draft proposals are written by the Permanent President, the High Representative and the members of the Council Secretariat (each member is assigned a topic from the main agenda). These proposals are extremely important for the success of the summit since they serve as the basis for discussion in the council meetings. Proposals should make clear statements of proposed actions and should be formulated in a way that they may be translated into the Presidency Conclusions. Each member of the organizing committee may choose to write more than one proposal on a given topic (e.g. on an issue of enlargement there probably should be a proposal on more than one country/region). Each participant should write proposals of a total length of 3-4 pages.
DELEGATION AGENDA PROPOSALS
Each country representative will have to work on at least one proposal from the draft agenda. You will have to revise, extend and/or cut the draft proposals created by the presidency or introduce a new, related agenda item. For the most part revisions should be done in groups. Therefore, students will have to identify potential allies and arrange group meetings, work on wikis (on moodle) and continuously redraft the proposals. You can join a group at any time. If the interests on certain proposals are clearly contrary, multiple groups should be formed. These should draft alternative proposals. As soon as you put the first draft version of your proposal on moodle it will be visible to all students. If a delegate wants to join a group belatedly to help edit the proposals they need to contact the group chair (to be determined by the groups). Using moodle will be essential for this group activity. A wiki with a draft version of the group proposals should be made available by Wednesday, November 21 (additional proposals may be introduced thereafter, but you need to have taken part in a proposal published on this day at the latest). Proposals need to be finalized by December 12th.
Field Trip Journals and Field Trip Reflection Essays AND Video Blog: You will have to keep a field trip journal for the three longer trips to the European institutions, Berlin and Prague, and your trip option. Details about the nature of this journal will be announced and discussed in the preparatory classes. The journal for the first two field trips shall be used as a base for one or two Field Trip Reflection Essays, covering 4-5 pages each.
Instead of writing two Reflection Essays you have the option to create a Video Blog for one of the first two trips (Berlin/Prague or Bruxelles/Paris). If you wish you are allowed to work in groups of two. You are also allowed to form teams consisting of a PO 250-student and a PO 350-student. A reflection of every day of the trip is mandatory; as well as an overall reflection of the trip.
Brief Biography of Instructor:
Anke Wiedemann, born in 1982, studied Political Science and Cultural Anthropology/ Ethnology in Freiburg and Washington D.C. and spent several months in Indonesia for field research. After her studies she spent six month in Manila/Philippines with the German Development Cooperation Organization (GIZ). She is affiliated with the Freiburg-based Arnold Bergstraesser Institute for Socio-Cultural Research and joined the IES Freiburg EU faculty in Spring 2011. She is currently working on her PHD and is a research assistant with the professorship for Governance in Multilevel Systems at the Albert-Ludwigs-University in Freiburg.
The Integrative Seminar is mandatory for all European Union Program students. It provides students with an understanding of the origin, development and workings of the European Union, and how these are related to political developments at both the national and international levels. It further constitutes the context in which preparatory sessions preceding each field trip are held and post field trip analysis is conducted. The most important function of the integrative seminar is to serve as a capstone for discussion and analysis of coursework and field study insights, as well as a launching pad for the Model EU simulation.
None
All IES courses require attendance and participation. Attendance is mandatory per IES policy. Any unexcused absence will incur a penalty of 3% on your final grade. Any student who has more than three (3) unexcused absences will receive an “F” as the final grade in the course. Absences due to sickness, religious observances, and family emergencies may be excusable at the discretion of the Center Director.
In the case of an excused absence, it is the student’s responsibility to inform the Academic Dean of the absence with an Official Excused Absence Form, as well as any other relevant documentation (e.g. a doctor’s note), and to keep a record thereof. This form must be turned in as soon as possible before the class, in the case of a planned absence, or immediately after the class, in the case of an unplanned absence, in order for the absence to be considered excused. It is also the student’s responsibility to inform the professor of the missed class. Students can collect and submit the Official Excused Absence Form from the office of the Academic Dean.
TESTS MISSED DURING UNEXCUSED ABSENCES CANNOT BE MADE UP!
The use of laptop computers during class is not permitted. Cell phones are to be switched off. Updated information on your course and readings can be found on the Moodle platform at https://eu.elearning.iesabroad.org/.
Students will complete the course having developed a comprehensive understanding of the political and economic processes over the wide range of the 27 EU countries. They will be able to produce academic analyses of the achievements, the short-comings, and the potential of the European project. In addition, they will then have developed comparative political-cultural competencies, allowing them a fresh perspective on their domestic political system.
They will be able to exhibit an in-depth understanding of complexities of the decision-making and policy making processes in the EU, and evaluate the effects of these processes on individual countries. In addition, they will be able to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the interrelation between the EU institutions and the political structures of the EU member states, including such concepts as subsidiarity and Europeanization. Finally, students will learn to use their insights into the multiplicity of power relations between the various member states.
The above objectives will be achieved by classroom lectures and discussions and independent study supplemented by first-hand experience on the field trips (including meetings with EU officials, specialized academics, and lobbyists working on or with the EU), and by active participation in the simulation of a European summit which also presents students with the opportunity to develop negotiating skills and articulate a given position.
Students should expect a dynamic course with many interactive components, such as simulations, quizzes and debates. The professor will guide the students through the course material with the goal that students be able to analyze the subject matter from different perspectives and draw their own conclusions. Students should expect a high level of engagement which will be reflected in both group work and individual presentations. Participation is part of the students grade, therefore it is expected that all students do contribute during classes, in moodle projects and assignments, field trip lectures and during the Model EU. There will be written assignments for some of the readings as well as activities on moodle. The field-study trips to the EU and related European institutions, to Berlin and Prague, and an elective trip, as well as the Model EU are core components of the course. Insights gained on the trips will flow into class work and the preparation of the Model EU. At the Model EU, each student will be a member of a country delegation, the European Commission, or the Council Presidency and Secretariat.
Mandatory attendance, classroom/field trip/moodle participation and reading and written assignments (25%), field trip reflection essays /video blog (20%), two exams (30%), Model EU preparation & participation (25%)
There will be two exams on contents covered in the seminars and/or the readings. There are three written assignments for the Model EU (the policy statement, a poster of the country/position you are presenting in the Model EU, and participation in delegation draft proposals). Moreover, students will have to keep a field trip journal for each trip and write an academic reflection or create a video blog that places the trips in the context of the course for the first two trips. These assignments are described in more detail later in this syllabus.
Seminar discussions are based upon the compulsory readings, written assignments and the teaching introductions given at each session.
Intensive Introductory Week (Monday, September 10 to Friday, September 14, 2012)
I. History of the European Union
1. Welcome to the European Union! (Monday, September 10, 9.00 – 10.30 am)
Introduction and expectations - What is the European Union?
2. Europe and the European Union (Monday, September 10, 10.45 – 12.15 pm)
Why a European Union? – Who can join? – How is policy made? – The EU and its citizens
3. The History of the EU I (Tuesday, September 11, 9.00 – 10.30 am)
Post-WW II Europe, the Cold War and European integration – From the Schuman Plan to the European Economic Community [Bache/George/Bulmer, 80-132]
4. The History of the EU II (Tuesday, September 11, 10.45 – 12.15 pm)
From the ‘Dark Ages’ to the European Union [Bache/George/Bulmer, 133-180]
5. Movie Session “Das Leben der Anderen” (Tuesday, September 11, 3.45 – 6.00 pm)
The movie "Das Leben der Anderen" on life in the GDR and particularly the role of the Stasi (internal security police of the GDR) will be shown. The movie is discussed in class on Friday, September 14.
6. The History of the EU III (Wednesday, September 12, 09.00 – 10.30 am)
Ever closer and ever larger Union? The EU’s survival strategies from the Treaty of Nice to the financial crisis [Bache/George/Bulmer, 181-222]
7. The EU Parliament (Wednesday, September 12, 10.45 – 12.15 pm)
Composition and functions – The struggle for power – Debating the EP [Bache/George/Bulmer, 292 - 313]
Field Study Trip to the European Parliament (Strasbourg). The workings and functions of the EP. (Wednesday, September 12, in the afternoon)
8. Cold War Histories – The EU, Germany and Czechoslovakia (Thursday, September 13, 9.00 – 10.30 am)
The Cold War and Europe – Examples from Germany and Czechoslovakia
9. Unified Germany (Thursday, September 13, 10.45 – 12:15 pm)
Looking back: 20 years of unified Germany – Movie discussion [Anderson, The Federal Republic at Twenty]
10. First Exam (Friday, September 14, 9.30 – 10.30 am)
Exam on the first 9 sessions
11. Field Study Preparation and Briefing on the Model EU (Friday, September 14, 10:45 – 12:15 pm)
APPLICATIONS FOR MODEL EU POSITIONS DUE BY 11:59 PM SUNDAY, September 16 (via Model EU Moodle Course)
Field Study Trip I (Berlin and Prague). Europe: From Division towards integration (Monday, September 17 to Saturday, September 22, 2012)
12.Field Trip I Reflection (Tuesday, September 25, 4.30 - 6.00 pm)
Assignment of Model EU positions
II. The Institutionional Architecture of the Eu: the Decision making process and the Decision makers
13. The EU Institutions 1 (Friday, September 28, 10.45-12.15 am)
The Institutional Architecture [Bache/George/Bulmer, 223 - 254]
Field Trip Reflection Essay I or FIELD TRIP VIDEO BLOG DUE
14. The EU Institutions 2 (Tuesday, October 2, 4.30-6.00 pm)
The European Commission [Bache/George/Bulmer, 255 - 271]
15. The EU Institutions 3 (Friday, October 5, 10.45-12.15 am)
The European Council and the Council of Ministers [Bache/George/Bulmer, 272 - 291]
16. The EU Institutions 4 (Tuesday, October 9, 4.30 – 6.00 pm)
The European Court of Justice & Organized Interests [Bache/George/Bulmer, 314 - 346]
17. Field Trip Preparation (Friday, October 12, 12.00-13.00 pm)
AGENDA WITH DRAFT PROPOSALS DUE
(Permanent Presidency, High Representative and Secretariat only!)
Field Study Trip II: European Institutions in Western Europe
(Monday, October 15 to Sunday, October 21, 2012)
18. Field Trip II Debriefing (Tuesday, October 23, 4.30-6.00 pm)
III. Policy Making and Policy Fields of the EU: Selected Examples and contextualization with the Model EU
19. Policies and Policy Making in the European Union (Friday, October 26, 10.45-12.15 am)
The European Policy Agenda – The EU Policy Process – Minor Policy Areas – Major Policy Areas [Bache/George/Bulmer, 347 - 369]
Field Trip Reflection Essay II or FIELD TRIP VIDEO BLOG DUE
20.Policy Issue I: Enlargement (Tuesday, October 30, 4.30-6.00 pm)
Historical overview – Enlargement procedure - Risks and chances of enlargement [Bache/George/Bulmer, 527 – 550]
21. Policy Issue II: Common Agricultural Policy (Tuesday, November 6, 4.30-6.00 pm)
Historical background – Pros and Cons of agricultural protection – CAP reforms, its future and its cost [Bache/George/Bulmer, 370 - 383]
22. Policy Issue III: Cohesion Policy (Friday, November 9, 10:45-12.15 pm)
Historical background – Pros and Cons of cohesion policy – Reforms, its future and its cost [Bache/George/Bulmer, 422 - 447]
POLICY STATEMENT DUE
23. Policy Issue IV: Freedom, Security and Justice (Tuesday, November 13, 4.30-6.00pm)
From intergovernmental cooperation to a supranational common security area [Bache/George/Bulmer, 466 - 488]
24. The Model EU Agenda (Friday, November 16, 10.45 – 12.15pm)
The policy fields and the Model EU Agenda – Country positions – country presentations [Reading: tba]
25. Field Trip III Preparation (Tuesday, November 20, 4.30-6.00 pm)
WORKING GROUPS NEED TO MAKE THEIR DELEGATION AGENDA PROPOSALS (draft versions) VISIBLE ON MODEL EU MOODLE COURSE
Field Study Trip III: Respective Trip Option
(Thursday, November 22 to Friday, November 30, 2012)
26. Field Trip III Debriefing (Tuesday, December 4, 4:30 – 6:00 pm)
27.Mock Debate on current topic in preparation for Model EU (Tuesday, December 11, 4.30-6.00 pm) Preparing the Model EU
Positions, Rules of Procedure, Preliminary Agenda, Policy Drafts, Policy Statements, Independent Research, Deadlines … [Handout for Model EU (moodle)]
DELEGATION AGENDA PROPOSALS NEED TO BE FINALIZED (December 12)
IV. Capstone: Model European Union Summit
28. Model EU preparatory session (Thursday, December 13, 6.15 to 8 pm)
Tour de Table – Final Setting of the Agenda – Coalition Caucuses
POSTER PRESENTATIONS DUE!
29. Model EU (Friday, December 14, all day)
30. Model EU (Saturday, December 15, all day)
31. Reflection on the term and the Model EU: The EU as a multinational composite product which is more than the sum of its parts (time: tba) European Union – more than a least common denominator / European Union – more than just its member states combined
32. Final (Wednesday, December 19, 10.00 – 11.30 am)
In addition, there will occasionally be other reading assignments and handouts from the instructor
**See my Moodle site for more useful links!**
In order to keep up to date on current events, especially those involving European affairs, it is recommended that you regularly read the Economist, a British weekly. Its name is misleading, as the paper caters not only to economists and the business community, but also to a wider educated public. It also always contains a section on “Europe”. In addition, listen to the BBC worldwide services and/or watch BBC television.
About the course structure: The course is divided into four main parts. The first is an intensive introductory phase during which you will be learning about the history of the EU and look at two member states, Germany and Czech Republic, in more detail. You will visit these two member states on the first field trip. There will be a test about the material covered at the end of this phase.
The second part begins with the twice weekly regular classes and is devoted to the institutional architecture of the EU as well as the four major EU decision-making institutions: the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice.
The third section of the course covers some of the major policy fields of the EU. First the background and historical development of these policies is discussed, before these are placed into context with current policies and politics in the EU. These policies are the four major topics of the third part of the class, a 2 1/2 day Model EU simulation of a European Council meeting to be held in the IES EU Center. The Model EU will be the capstone of the class.
Moreover, there are four classes integrated into the second part which are devoted to the preparation of and reflection on the field-study trips. These classes are designed to ensure that students derive as much information and inspiration from the field-study lectures as possible and that they are able to connect their insights with the academic work, both classes and Model EU, in Freiburg.
The Model EU
The Model EU is a simulation of a summit meeting of the European Council (Heads of Government/State and Foreign Ministers). Students will take on different roles at this simulation representing countries or institutions in the negotiations about a pre-set agenda. The basic agenda topics are: 1) Enlargement and the Neighborhood Policy, 2) Reforming CAP in light of the new financial framework, 3) Reforming Cohesion Policy in light of the new financial framework, and 4) The Area of Freedom Security and Justice. This agenda will be narrowed down and focused by the Permanent President, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs in cooperation with the Secretariat of the Council. In addition, the rotating presidency will cooperate in setting the agenda. Moreover, you will receive draft proposals by the Presidency and the Secretariat of the Council on the agenda items. Both, the agenda and the draft proposals, will be distributed about two weeks prior to the due date of the policy statements. All delegations may write or prepare proposals of their own or in cooperation with other delegations to be introduced at the summit meeting. The agenda is in part discussed in separate councils, one featuring Heads of Government/State (Reforming CAP and Cohesion Policy, Financial Framework) and another Foreign Ministers (Freedom Security and Justice, Enlargement and Neighborhood Policy).
The Model EU is prepared in class both in terms of procedure and in terms of content. However, it is imperative that all students prepare for the simulation independently. All participants need to be well versed in the Rules of Procedure as well as the topics being discussed in their forum. Moreover, all students need to have a clear concept of their role (e.g. the position of their government on the topics) to be able to play this role effectively, adjust to unforeseen developments and to generally stay in character. Faculty will be present at the summit meeting. However, they will interfere as little as possible with the proceedings. The effective running of the simulation is the responsibility of the Presidency / High Representative and all other participants.
At the end of the Model EU you will have to present your Presidency Conclusions. This is a document consisting of all decisions you were able to reach during the summit meeting. These will be based on the draft proposals prepared by the Presidency / Secretariat, but will necessarily reflect the national and ideological positions brought to the bargaining table. Moreover, some proposals may have been successfully introduced or broadened during the summit. Yet others may have failed to receive sufficient backing from all member states and there for will not make it into the Presidency Conclusions.
Students need to apply for a particular position, either a country delegate position or an institutional role (Permanent President, High Representative of CFSP, Council Secretariat and Commissioner). All students must hand in written applications stating their motivation, qualification and expectations for the hoped for position(s) and/or country (please provide alternative choices). You can also apply in a more general manner, e.g. “I would like to represent a smaller country as Foreign Minister because …”. For the chair positions (Permanent President and High Representative) experience in similar simulations or student government will be helpful. Applications should be 0.5 to 1 page long.
Policy Statement, Draft Proposals and Model EU Poster
If you are representing a country at the Model-EU you will have to prepare a policy statement which presents the basic stances of your country delegation on the issues on the agenda. The Permanent President, the High Representative of CFSP and the members of the Council Secretariat (organizing committee) will write draft proposals on the agenda topics instead. Moreover, you will have to provide a poster of the country/ position you are representing in the Model EU with the most important information concerning the Model EU-topics.
Policy Statements
Except for a 1 page cover letter policy statements are written separately by each member of the delegation (Heads of Government/State and Finance Ministers) on the topics on the respective agendas (each participant has to write 3-4 pages). However, the policy statements are handed in collectively as one document. Moreover, the delegation has to write an introductory note together. The statements should have one common format. Students are graded separately for their respective parts of the policy statement.
There are various ways to write your policy statement. The essential aspect is that you have to provide your delegation’s basic stance on the issues at hand. Depending on your strategy and your interest in a given topic you can be more or less open about your positions and intentions. You might for example want to hint at possible compromises to show your conciliatory attitude. In contrast, you might find it advantages on another issue to take a strong bargaining position.
Policy statements are written in “high style.” You are writing as the highest representatives of your country and these are official documents. This does not mean that you should write meaningless statements in inflated prose. The policy statements need to have substance as they are the basis for discussion at the summit meeting.
Draft Proposals
Draft proposals are written by the Permanent President, the High Representative and the members of the Council Secretariat (each member is assigned a topic from the main agenda). These proposals are extremely important for the success of the summit since they serve as the basis for discussion in the council meetings. Proposals should make clear statements of proposed actions and should be formulated in a way that they may be translated into the Presidency Conclusions. Each member of the organizing committee may choose to write more than one proposal on a given topic (e.g. on an issue of enlargement there probably should be a proposal on more than one country/region). Each participant should write proposals of a total length of 3-4 pages.
DELEGATION AGENDA PROPOSALS
Each country representative will have to work on at least one proposal from the draft agenda. You will have to revise, extend and/or cut the draft proposals created by the presidency or introduce a new, related agenda item. For the most part revisions should be done in groups. Therefore, students will have to identify potential allies and arrange group meetings, work on wikis (on moodle) and continuously redraft the proposals. You can join a group at any time. If the interests on certain proposals are clearly contrary, multiple groups should be formed. These should draft alternative proposals. As soon as you put the first draft version of your proposal on moodle it will be visible to all students. If a delegate wants to join a group belatedly to help edit the proposals they need to contact the group chair (to be determined by the groups). Using moodle will be essential for this group activity. A wiki with a draft version of the group proposals should be made available by Wednesday, November 21 (additional proposals may be introduced thereafter, but you need to have taken part in a proposal published on this day at the latest). Proposals need to be finalized by December 12th.
Field Trip Journals and Field Trip Reflection Essays AND Video Blog: You will have to keep a field trip journal for the three longer trips to the European institutions, Berlin and Prague, and your trip option. Details about the nature of this journal will be announced and discussed in the preparatory classes. The journal for the first two field trips shall be used as a base for one or two Field Trip Reflection Essays, covering 4-5 pages each.
Instead of writing two Reflection Essays you have the option to create a Video Blog for one of the first two trips (Berlin/Prague or Bruxelles/Paris). If you wish you are allowed to work in groups of two. You are also allowed to form teams consisting of a PO 250-student and a PO 350-student. A reflection of every day of the trip is mandatory; as well as an overall reflection of the trip.
Anke Wiedemann, born in 1982, studied Political Science and Cultural Anthropology/ Ethnology in Freiburg and Washington D.C. and spent several months in Indonesia for field research. After her studies she spent six month in Manila/Philippines with the German Development Cooperation Organization (GIZ). She is affiliated with the Freiburg-based Arnold Bergstraesser Institute for Socio-Cultural Research and joined the IES Freiburg EU faculty in Spring 2011. She is currently working on her PHD and is a research assistant with the professorship for Governance in Multilevel Systems at the Albert-Ludwigs-University in Freiburg.